MSW 501week 11 discussion


It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Response
For this discussion, please respond to the following questions:
When did we (as a society) decide that the words “WE THE PEOPLE” meant all people? Explain how this statement is often misunderstood and the necessity for social advocacy to ensure that this statement is inclusive of all people.
Explain the importance of social advocacy and what would happen if it no longer existed in our society and the impact it would be in the work that we do with clients.
Christia Jackson (She/Her)When did we (as a society) decide that the words “WE THE PEOPLE” meant all people? Explain how this statement is often misunderstood and the necessity for social advocacy to ensure that this statement is inclusive of all people.The words “We the People” are the opening words of the United States Constitution’s Preamble, and they were written in 1787. At that time, however, the phrase “We the People” did not include all people. The original Constitution explicitly excluded women, enslaved people, and non-property-owning men from participating in the democratic process.Over time, however, the meaning of “We the People” has evolved to include all people, regardless of gender, race, religion, or socio-economic status. This evolution has been driven by social advocacy and movements for civil rights and equality.Despite this evolution, the phrase “We the People” is still sometimes misunderstood and used to exclude certain groups of people. For example, some people argue that undocumented immigrants, LGBTQ+ individuals, and other marginalized groups should not be included in the definition of “We the People.”Social advocacy is necessary to ensure that the phrase “We the People” remains inclusive and represents all members of society. This advocacy can take many forms, including political activism, community organizing, and education. By advocating for the rights and inclusion of all people, we can ensure that the promise of the Constitution’s Preamble is fulfilled and that our society becomes more just and equitable for everyone.Explain the importance of social advocacy and what would happen if it no longer existed in our society and the impact it would be in the work that we do with clients.Social advocacy is the process of promoting social change and justice through collective action, public education, and community organizing. Social advocacy is important because it can help to create a more just and equitable society by advocating for the rights and needs of marginalized and underrepresented groups.Without social advocacy, our society would be less equitable and less democratic. Marginalized groups would be less likely to have their voices heard, their rights protected, and their needs met. This could lead to increased inequality, discrimination, and social unrest.In the work that we do with clients, social advocacy is critical because it helps us to understand the systemic and structural barriers that our clients may be facing. By advocating for policy and social changes that address these barriers, we can help our clients to overcome the challenges they face and achieve their goals.For example, if we work with clients who are experiencing poverty, social advocacy can help to address the root causes of poverty, such as inadequate access to education, employment, and affordable housing. By advocating for policies that address these issues, we can help our clients to access the resources they need to improve their lives and overcome the challenges they face.Heather Mark Charles makes a very compelling presentation in “We the People” which contends that “We the People” has never truly meant “all people.”  He begins by quoting President Barak Obama as contending that we have come to this conclusion. But his argument is that this has never happened precisely because it was never meant to mean “all people”. He contends that when we see women earning less than men or men being discriminated against that we should not be surprised by this because the “Constitution is doing what it is designed to do (i.e. protect the rights of white land-owning males at the exclusion of everyone else.” When he confirms the US Supreme Court case of 2005 City of Sherill vs Oneida, it is hard to argue against his logic.  He argues that society often misunderstands this statement because they fail to understand that the problem with reaching this goal is that our very foundations are filled with white supremacy.  I had never heard of the Doctrine of Discovery and was unaware of its insidious influence on American society. But he makes a compelling case. Meanwhile, Family Advocacy explains the importance of advocacy by saying, “If people weren’t allowed to advocate (then) unjust, unreasonable, and unfair things would be allowed to continue. In other words, it is through advocacy that society is made better by questioning unreasonable and unjust practices. It is a form of setting up a check against injustice. It is through advocacy that we bring attention to wrongs in society and are given the opportunity to correct them.ReferencesCharles, Mark. (24 January 2019). “We the People’- The three most misunderstood words in US HIstory. TedTalk. YouTube. to an external site.Minimize VideoFamily Advocacy. (31 March 2016). What is Social Advocacy and Why is It Important? You Tube.

We offer the bestcustom writing paper services. We have done this question before, we can also do it for you.

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.